VIDEO: D'Souza Flays Hillary Over Emailgate On "Hannity"

Dinesh D’Souza appeared alongside Sean Hannity in the Fox News studio in New York on Thursday, January 22 to lay down the truth about what emailgate means for a Hillary candidacy.

“Hillary is not going to do things that don’t benefit her in some way. She didn’t set up that private server by accident. There was a reason for that.”

D’Souza explained there is more going on than the Hillary campaign would like us to know.

“The full story here is not out. The idea that a highly competent person who has been in public life almost all her life would do this as a goof makes no sense.”

Fox News Contributor and Democratic campaign consultant Joe Trippi showed up to defend Hillary and things get heated. Watch:

D’Souza also pointed out that even progressives are tiring of Hillary’s baggage:

“If Hillary Clinton can not beat an avowed socialist who’s a Rip Van Winkle from the 1960s, it shows you that even among Democrats there is a huge distaste for the Clintons. It helped Obama in 2008, and it just may well propel the Sanders quixotic candidacy in 2016.”

 

Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats for the first time. Can Trump—and we—come together and save America for the second time?

Death of a Nation is available on DVD, Blu-ray, and Digital HD now! Click here to order now.

Keep reading:

WaPo: Inspector General Issues Alert Over $6 Billion In Missing State Dept. Money
Washington Free Beacon: Haitians Protest "Billions Stolen" By Clinton Foundation
American Thinker: "Stealing America" Review
WND: Obama DOJ Stiffs Congress Over D'Souza File
VIDEO: House Committee Grills Obama's DOJ On D'Souza Prosecution
Read The Letter From Congress About D'Souza That Obama's DOJ Ignored
Politico: Obama Pushing Thousands Of New Regulations
National Review: Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations of 2015
Death of a Nation banner

Through stunning historical recreations and a searching examination of fascism and white supremacy, Death of a Nation cuts through progressive big lies to expose hidden history and explosive truths.

Sign up to be notified about new releases! Enter your email below and we'll send you more information.

By filling out the form above, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

16 Comments

  • david reneau says:

    January 22, 2016 at 10:46 AM

    You have to listen she said classified. If email was marked top secret or anything other than “classified” she told the truth.

    • Spencer says:

      January 22, 2016 at 7:04 PM

      Glad to see I’m not the only one that noticed that.

    • Al Gore says:

      January 22, 2016 at 9:39 PM

      Well it’s kinda mute all the way around. She was using her personal email for Government business when clearly she wasn’t supposed to be. You guys can dream up all the loopholes you want, but bottom line is, you stick with her, you’re a god damn traitor communist to this country. It’s unbelievable that you would even consider that murderer for a President. You’d be better off with Kim Jong Un.

    • Ace says:

      January 23, 2016 at 7:41 AM

      She told the truth? Seriously? Next you’ll say “What difference at this point does it make”.

    • John Tomson says:

      January 23, 2016 at 4:15 PM

      IDIOT SAVANTS!

    • Marilyn says:

      January 27, 2016 at 8:27 AM

      They also said that she instructed her assistant to change the subject line to not show it was classified even though it was and send it to her in an e-mail to her assistant. If she did this, she broke the law!

    • Ralph DeVane says:

      January 29, 2016 at 7:46 PM

      The law is really clear. It doesn’t matter how the emails were labeled. She committed a crime.

  • geobrecke says:

    January 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM

    How long have we been trying to get to the bottom of her emails and her unsecure server? And Joe says the timing is curious? He clearly wants further investigation to happen AFTER it’s too late?

  • Robert Tids says:

    January 22, 2016 at 11:08 AM

    One has to wonder just how much criminal activity will go unchecked by what was once the greatest and feared law enforcement known as the FBI. It’s more than obvious there’s a coup d’état being orchestrated in the Federal Government, otherwise former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would have been indicted long ago as well as President Obama. The very first time I ever heard of “Progressives” were when the communist hid and took over the Progressive Party of 1948. If the Democratic Party is more than comfortable to run a “Progressive” and a “Socialist” as candidates, then indeed our country is heading in the wrong direction, and there needs to be investigations to the Coup d’état I spoke to earlier. President Obama said if the people can’t trust the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches of the government, we have a problem. I AM more than assertively assured we have a problem, and that problem needs to be addressed immediately.

    • richard johnson says:

      January 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM

      The coup you speak of is a concerted effort to move our economy from a free enterprise, very successful for the middle class into a Socialist/ feudal economy with no middle class. Can you say serf?

  • Billy clark says:

    January 22, 2016 at 1:41 PM

    It is true the 100 FBI THAT WAS ON THIS CASE FOUND 24 TOP SECRET EMAILS THAT SHE HAS SENT AND RECEIVED ON HER PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER, YES THEY ARE TRUE QUIT TAKING UP FOR HER,PROSECUTE HER,SHE IS DANGEROUS TO THE UNITED STATES, AND A LIAR.

  • M.Pray says:

    January 22, 2016 at 3:11 PM

    Couldn’t the individual(Pagle something) who set up the non secure server for H.Clinton (who took the fifth when questioned) be charged with conspiracy? He knows that it was wrong and is obviously hiding something so charge him with obstruction of an investigation and then lets see if he changes his mind about the fifth. Usually when an IT person sets up something like that he also sets up a automatic backup unit separate from the main server so if it crashed they could retrieve the files. That may what he is hiding….that he has that or was the person who destroyed it. And nobody has reported who was the person who actually scrubbed her server of the 30K “personal emails. We need some answers before the voting/election gets to close.

  • Ron Pitkin says:

    January 22, 2016 at 6:20 PM

    State Department e-mails are NEVER marked “Classified.” There are several designations for material that is high security, but “Classified” is not one of them. Seriously. Her using that word is just a distraction. It’s like when Obama said Jonathan Gruber was never an employee of the White House. No one said he was, because he was a CONSULTANT who was paid millions of dollars to write the Obamacare bill. Be careful whenever take a politician’s word as seriously. “I wasn’t paid a dime” usually means “I took a hell of a lot more than a dime”‘

  • Marilyn says:

    January 27, 2016 at 8:28 AM

    They also said that she instructed her assistant to change the subject line to not show it was classified even though it was and send it to her in an e-mail to her assistant. If she did this, she broke the law!

  • Troy says:

    January 29, 2016 at 12:07 PM

    The main reason she used a private email account on her private server was because she wanted to be able to hide the payoffs she was receiving from foriegn governments.

  • Andee says:

    January 30, 2016 at 1:16 PM

    She can use all the synonyms she wants …. classified, top secret, etc. it all has the same meaning. She says poo and he says cr*p…. it still smells the same.