Slate: Judge Orders Bill Cosby To Face Trial

Originally posted at Slate by Jeremy Stahl.

The first pretrial hearing for Bill Cosby’s aggravated indecent assault case in Pennsylvania included a flurry of new revelations about the incident, including an account from Cosby and one from his accuser Andrea Constand that were made public for the first time on Tuesday. At the conclusion of the hearing Judge Elizabeth McHugh decided that there was enough evidence for the trial to go ahead.

The details as described by both parties in interviews with detectives more than a decade ago show that Constand visited Cosby’s home in 2004, he offered her pills and wine which she took, he fondled her, and offered her a muffin in the morning as she left. Where the two parties differ is that Cosby claims the encounter was consensual and Constand said she was unable to consent because she was drugged.

“I had no strength in my legs. They felt rubbery and like jelly,” Constand told detectives in 2005 about her response to taking pills that Cosby has described as Benadryl. “I felt spacey. Everything was blurry or dizzy. I had no thought to call 911.”

“I told him, ‘I can’t even talk, Mr. Cosby.’ I started to panic,” she said at the time.

Cosby’s version of events were that it was a mutual romantic encounter.

“We began to pet—touching, kissing with clothes on,” he said in his own statement to investigators at the time. “I never intended to have sexual intercourse like naked bodies with Andrea. We were petting and I enjoyed it.”

When he was asked whether he had ever had intercourse with Constand, Cosby told detectives: “Never asleep or awake.” He also said that in a subsequent phone call with Constand’s mother, he offered to pay for her grad school if she maintained a 3.0 grade point average.

The case is going forward more than a decade after the incident because the original prosecutors had decided not to try it saying they didn’t think they could prove the charges at trial, but new prosecutors have decided that additional information that has come to light in the years since made the case prosecutable.

Nearly 60 women have come forward with allegations of sexual abuse by Cosby, many of them telling similar stories of assault after druggings. Last year, the Associated Press revealed details of depositions from Constand’s civil trial against Cosby, which was ultimately settled. Many of those details coincide with what was revealed in court on Tuesday.

On Sunday, the AP published some additional details from those depositions and republished others. As previously revealed, Cosby said in his deposition that he told Constand’s mother that “digital penetration” occurred during the incident in question.

As also previously reported, Cosby admitted to using the sedative drug Quaaludes “for young women” he “wanted to have sex with.” He also admitted in that deposition that he gave Constand three pills, which he again characterized as Benadryl.

Here’s more from Cosby’s deposition about the incident, which he described as occurring in “the area that is somewhere between permission and rejection”:

Q: So, you’re not telling us that you verbally asked her for permission?

A: I didn’t say it verbally, I said. The action is my hand on her midriff, which is skin. I’m not lifting any clothing up. This is, I don’t remember fully what it is, but it’s there and I can feel. I got her skin and it’s just above the hand and it’s just above where you can go under the pants.

The AP also revealed that he had given Quaaludes to 19-year-old Therese (Picking) Serignese in the 1970s before having sex with her and wasn’t sure whether the encounter was consensual or not:

Q: Did you give her quaaludes?

A: Yes.

Q: What effect did the quaaludes have on her?

A: She became in those days what was called high.

Q: She said that she believes she was not in the position to consent to intercourse after you gave her the drug. Do you believe that is correct?

A: I don’t know. … How many years ago are we talking about? 197(6)? … I meet Ms. Picking in Las Vegas. She meets me backstage. I give her quaaludes. We then have sex.

Constand’s is the only accusation against Cosby that has actually resulted in criminal charges, with many of the accusations falling outside of statutes of limitations. The charges against Cosby carry the potential for five to 10 years in prison and a $25,000 fine if he’s convicted. He is currently out on $1 million bail.

Read more at Slate by Jeremy Stahl.


Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats for the first time. Can Trump—and we—come together and save America for the second time?

Death of a Nation is available on DVD, Blu-ray, and Digital HD now! Click here to order now.

Keep reading:

WSJ: Watchdog Faults Hillary Clinton’s Email Practices at State Department
Vox: The Real Reason Hillary Clinton Is Beating Bernie Sanders
The Daily Caller: Clinton Foundation Got $100M From ‘Blood Minerals’ Firm
HuffPo: VA Governor under FBI investigation over campaign donations
Breitbart: Hillary Clinton Says She's Putting Bill Back In Charge If She's Elected
NBC: Officer Charged In Freddie Gray Case Not Guilty On All Counts
Politico: Progressive Blogger Fired For Calling Hillary Clinton Ally A "Scumbag"
PolitiFact: What We Know About The FBI's Investigation Into Hillary's Emails
Death of a Nation banner

Through stunning historical recreations and a searching examination of fascism and white supremacy, Death of a Nation cuts through progressive big lies to expose hidden history and explosive truths.

Sign up to be notified about new releases! Enter your email below and we'll send you more information.

By filling out the form above, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.


  • krisdunn5307 says:

    May 26, 2016 at 11:18 AM

    The mainstream media and liberals are going after Bill Cosby with a vengeance. Yet, Slick Willie and his enabler Hillary get a pass. Neither of these two should ever be allowed near any government office. How sick is it when voters are willing to overlook the lies, the criminal acts, the jeopardizing of national security Hillary allowed with her personal email server, and the character assassinations these two have conducted over the years, to anyone who opposed them or told the truth about their activities?

    Why are we rewarding lawlessness and incompetence? Obama was re-elected despite constantly getting our troops killed, his incredibly low labor usage, declining wage growth, and skyrocketing health care costs. He made it his mission to provide “affordable” care with the ACA, yet my rates doubled up to $500/month (compare this with my ever decreasing car insurance rates… only $25/month from Insurance Panda now). Yet we voted him in for 8 years? And we want to elect Hillary?

    Sexual predator Slick Wille for a husband and Huma Abedin with internet pervert husband Carlos Danger as best friends? Where in Hell do these people come from and how stupid can their constituents be? Even today, millions line up to see any of them, acting as though in the presence of greatness rather than embarrassed by their reprobate, nefarious character.

  • Michael Dickson says:

    May 26, 2016 at 12:41 PM

    But he gave her a muffin!