Fox News: How Schumer and Dems May Have Sealed Gorsuch's Confirmation

Originally posted at Fox News Politics by Alex Diaz.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has been girding his troops to block Judge Neil Gorsuch since President Trump nominated him on Feb. 1.

Senate Democrats may have to resort to a filibuster, to pull it off, and Schumer said as much when he warned, “the Senate must insist upon 60 votes for any Supreme Court nominee.” Sixty is the magic number needed to end a filibuster and allow a vote. There are only 52 Republicans in the Senate.

Schumer was noted for his agile maneuvering in blocking the nominees of the previous Republican president, George W. Bush, when Democrats were also in the minority. Then, the New York Democrat called the filibuster “part of the hallowed process.”

In the Bush years, the Democrats warned the GOP against ending the filibuster. In 2005, then-Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) went so far as to suggest “the threat to change Senate rules is a raw abuse of power and will destroy the very checks and balances our founding fathers put in place to prevent absolute power by any one branch of government.”

But after President Obama was elected, and Democrats gained a Senate majority, Democrats changed their tune. The filibuster became a symbol of Republican obstructionism, and had to be stopped.

Thus, in 2013, the Democrats used the “nuclear option,” voting to change the rules for the President’s nominees, and in essence ending the filibuster by requiring only a simple majority. President Obama himself suggested that the move was necessary because Republicans had used the filibuster as “a reckless and relentless tool to grind all business to a halt.” President Obama added that while “neither party has been blameless… today’s pattern of obstruction, it just isn’t normal. It’s not what our Founders envisioned.”

Then the Democrats lost the Senate. And changed their minds. Again. Now once more they warn the GOP against invoking the nuclear option.

“If a nominee cannot get 60 votes, you don’t change the rules, you change the nominee,” Schumer said.

It’s not the only time hypocrisy found its way into recent Supreme Court debate, critics believe.

When Justice Antonin Scalia died in 2016, Democrats insisted his slot on the Supreme Court be filled as quickly as possible. In a statement at the time, Reid suggested that “failing to fill this vacancy would be a shameful abdication of one of the Senate’s most essential constitutional responsibilities.”

President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland, but Republicans, under Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, declared there would be no vote for a nominee so late in the President’s term. The Senate, he said, would wait until the country had decided on a new leader to make the pick.

It was a big risk for the GOP, especially with Hillary Clinton leading in the polls. But it seemed to pay off for the GOP when Donald Trump was elected, and then picked Neil Gorsuch.

Democrats were outraged by the tactic. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-D-Mas.., said in a tweet that the Republicans were betraying “the duties they swore to uphold.” She also wrote it would “threaten both the Constitution and our democracy itself.”

However, no Democrat should have been surprised—especially Schumer.

In 2007, with the Democrats having recently regained the majority, Schumer said, regarding potential Supreme Court nominees “we should reverse the presumption of confirmation.” In fact, in the same speech, he regretted not having blocked Bush’s previous nominations. President Bush didn’t get the chance to nominate another Supreme Court Justice, but the Democrats appeared more than ready to block anyone if he did.

So today, with yet another nomination in front of him, critics are looking for Schumer to do whatever he can to stop Gorsuch, even if it means taking yet another position on the filibuster.

If so, Republicans may invoke the “nuclear option,” and change the rules so that a simple majority can confirm a Supreme Court nominee. If they do, at least they’ll have precedent, thanks to the Democrats.

Read more at Fox News Politics.


Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats for the first time. Can Trump—and we—come together and save America for the second time?

Death of a Nation banner

Death of a Nation is in theaters nationwide August 3! Click here to learn more.

Keep reading:

VIDEO: D'Souza Explains Preet Bharara is Ruthless and Deceitful
Washington Examiner: US attorney defies Trump, won't resign
NYT: Trump Abruptly Orders 46 Obama-Era Prosecutors to Resign
VIDEO: Dinesh D'Souza goes UNCHAINED at Trinity University
Breitbart: Obama Response to Trump ‘Wiretap’ Claim Raises More Questions
Campus Reform: Trinity Students Deface D'Souza Flyers to Protest 'Propaganda'
VIDEO: Dinesh D'Souza Responds To "Worst Actor of 2016" Award
The Wrap: Dinesh D’Souza’s Anti-Hillary Doc Beats ‘Batman v Superman’ for Worst Picture at Razzies

Through stunning historical recreations and a searching examination of fascism and white supremacy, Death of a Nation cuts through progressive big lies to expose hidden history and explosive truths.

Sign up to be the first to see the official movie trailer! Enter your email below and we'll let you know as soon as you can watch the shocking new trailer.

By filling out the form above, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.


  • Steven says:

    March 21, 2017 at 6:33 am

    The MOST IMPORTANT quote from Gorsuchs in my mind is something about if a judge is doing their job properly, they will issue rulings they DISAGREE with as a matter of policy, but believe the LAW requires. Frankly, I would love to see a judge whose written opinions took the form of “I wish the law allowed me to rule X, but it requires me to rule Y”.

  • garry says:

    March 21, 2017 at 11:28 am

    Don’t EVER expect the democrats to do the right thing!

  • Ancient Hoosier says:

    March 21, 2017 at 12:33 pm

    Senator Schumer has no idea what leadership is all about. He is just unreasoned opposition, which calls into question whether he cares about anything other than the twenty five percent of the ideologes that he represents. When 24 democrat senators face the electors next year, the sixty vote firewall will belong to the Republicans. The reasonable democrat opposition like Warner, Donnelly, Manchin and the senator from Montana will have to abandon their leadership if they want to be reelected .

  • DORIS A BROWN says:

    March 23, 2017 at 4:33 pm

    Schumer doesn’t know anything except his donors don’t want the Democrats to approve Judge Norsuch’s Confirmation to the Supreme Court. He came out today – acting like “it was so hard to make up his mind”, but he just couldn’t vote in favor of Judge Norsuch. This Judge walked all over these idiots at the Confirmatiion Hearing with his expertise, knowledge and contained a smile. Franken has to be the most intelligent jackass on the Committee; Leahy is so damn old he can’t even READ HS QUESTIONS; Blumberg was ignorant as hell and then you had one who all he could do is wave a pencil like someone who just got out of the looney tune. Does Schumer really think we are buying his act? All they did was whine about Judge Garland not having a Hearing.